Los Angeles Clippers · — · #—
—
| Period | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | PRA | STL | BLK | TOV | 2PM | 2PA | 2P% | 3PM | 3PA | 3P% | FTM | FTA | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Last 3 | 3 | 31.8 | 17.7 | 2.3 | 5.7 | 25.7 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 10.7 |
| 46.9% |
| 1.7 |
| 6.3 |
| 26.3% |
| 2.7 |
| 2.7 |
| 100.0% |
| Last 5 | 5 | 29.8 | 16.2 | 2.6 | 5.2 | 24.0 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 1.8 | 4.8 | 9.6 | 50.0% | 1.6 | 6.8 | 23.5% | 1.8 | 2.2 | 81.8% |
| Last 10 | 10 | 29.6 | 18.5 | 2.3 | 5.8 | 26.6 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 2.9 | 4.0 | 7.7 | 51.9% | 2.8 | 7.3 | 38.4% | 2.1 | 2.4 | 87.5% |
| Last 20 | 20 | 28.8 | 19.9 | 2.4 | 6.4 | 28.6 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 7.9 | 51.6% | 3.3 | 7.5 | 43.7% | 1.9 | 2.2 | 84.4% |
| Season | 45 | 29.9 | 18.8 | 2.4 | 6.7 | 27.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 2.9 | 4.2 | 8.1 | 51.4% | 2.7 | 6.8 | 39.6% | 2.3 | 2.7 | 86.1% |
high on-ball creation, high assist rate, low contested shots per minute, low offensive rebounding
2025-26 season · fitted over 2022-23–2025-26
Style profile over 446 qualified players (8+ games, 10+ min/game). 100% is an identical profile; 50% is unrelated.
| Date | Matchup | W/L | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | FGM | FGA | FG% | 3PM | 3PA | 3P% | FTM | FTA | FT% | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-12 | LAC vs. GSW | W | 26.6 | 15 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 17 | 35.3% | 1 | 5 | 20.0% | 2 | 2 | 100.0% | -9.0 |
| 2026-04-10 | LAC @ POR | L | 40.5 | 16 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 16 | 31.3% | 2 | 8 | 25.0% | 4 | 4 | 100.0% | -2.0 |
| 2026-04-07 | LAC vs. DAL | W | 28.4 | 22 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 2 | 6 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 100.0% | 22.0 |
| 2026-04-05 | LAC @ SAC | W | 24.4 | 17 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 2 | 7 | 28.6% | 1 | 1 | 100.0% | 10.0 |
| 2026-04-02 | LAC vs. SAS | L | 29.0 | 11 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 17 | 29.4% | 1 | 8 | 12.5% | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | -19.0 |
| 2026-03-31 | LAC vs. POR | L | 37.3 | 20 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 7 | 17 | 41.2% | 3 | 8 | 37.5% | 3 | 3 | 100.0% | -7.0 |
| 2026-03-29 | LAC @ MIL | W | 26.7 | 15 | 2 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 9 | 55.6% | 3 | 7 | 42.9% | 2 | 2 | 100.0% | 19.0 |
| 2026-03-27 | LAC @ IND | W | 34.5 | 30 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 10 | 19 | 52.6% | 6 | 11 | 54.5% | 4 | 4 | 100.0% | 2.0 |
| 2026-03-25 | LAC vs. TOR | W | 30.1 | 24 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 16 | 56.3% | 5 | 9 | 55.6% | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 12.0 |
| 2026-03-23 | LAC vs. MIL | W | 18.1 | 15 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 71.4% | 3 | 4 | 75.0% | 2 | 2 | 100.0% | 25.0 |
| 2026-03-21 | LAC @ DAL | W | 38.9 | 41 | 3 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 15 | 24 | 62.5% | 8 | 12 | 66.7% | 3 | 3 | 100.0% | 9.0 |
| 2026-03-18 | LAC @ NOP | L | 28.8 | 13 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | -11.0 |
| 2026-03-16 | LAC vs. SAS | L | 32.1 | 25 | 2 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 9 | 21 | 42.9% | 4 | 9 | 44.4% | 3 | 3 | 100.0% | -4.0 |
| 2026-03-14 | LAC vs. SAC | L | 30.2 | 25 | 3 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 20 | 45.0% | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 100.0% | 17.0 |
| 2026-03-11 | LAC vs. MIN | W | 23.5 | 21 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 13 | 61.5% | 5 | 9 | 55.6% | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 5.0 |
| 2026-03-09 | LAC vs. NYK | W | 30.3 | 23 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 16 | 43.8% | 5 | 9 | 55.6% | 4 | 6 | 66.7% | 20.0 |
| 2026-03-07 | LAC @ MEM | W | 26.3 | 21 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 20 | 40.0% | 3 | 8 | 37.5% | 2 | 3 | 66.7% | 10.0 |
| 2026-03-04 | LAC vs. IND | W | 23.7 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 20.0 |
| 2026-03-02 | LAC @ GSW | W | 22.8 | 12 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 44.4% | 2 | 7 | 28.6% | 2 | 2 | 100.0% | 5.0 |
| 2026-01-14 | CLE @ PHI | W | 23.0 | 20 | 3 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 13 | 61.5% | 3 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 10.0 |
| 2026-01-12 | CLE vs. UTA | L | 33.6 | 23 | 2 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 17 | 41.2% | 5 | 9 | 55.6% | 4 | 4 | 100.0% | -6.0 |
| 2026-01-10 | CLE vs. MIN | W | 28.7 | 22 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 13 | 76.9% | 1 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 100.0% | 21.0 |
| 2026-01-08 | CLE @ MIN | L | 36.5 | 16 | 1 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 16 | 43.8% | 1 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 4 | 25.0% | -24.0 |
| 2026-01-06 | CLE @ IND | W | 33.0 | 29 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 23 | 60.9% | 1 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 1.0 |
| 2026-01-04 | CLE vs. DET | L | 32.1 | 16 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 15 | 46.7% | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 100.0% | -1.0 |
| 2026-01-02 | CLE vs. DEN | W | 32.1 | 18 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 100.0% | -1.0 |
| 2025-12-31 | CLE vs. PHX | W | 29.0 | 19 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 13 | 53.8% | 2 | 7 | 28.6% | 3 | 3 | 100.0% | 15.0 |
| 2025-12-29 | CLE @ SAS | W | 31.4 | 15 | 5 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 13 | 38.5% | 1 | 5 | 20.0% | 4 | 4 | 100.0% | 3.0 |
| 2025-12-27 | CLE @ HOU | L | 24.4 | 12 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 9 | 55.6% | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | -32.0 |
| 2025-12-25 | CLE @ NYK | L | 36.0 | 20 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 75.0% | 3 | 4 | 75.0% | 0.0 |
| 2025-12-23 | CLE vs. NOP | W | 28.6 | 10 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 9 | 44.4% | 2 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 14.0 |
| 2025-12-22 | CLE vs. CHA | W | 30.4 | 27 | 4 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 15 | 60.0% | 5 | 6 | 83.3% | 4 | 4 | 100.0% | 13.0 |
| 2025-12-19 | CLE vs. CHI | L | 33.2 | 35 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 13 | 27 | 48.1% | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 100.0% | 3.0 |
| 2025-12-17 | CLE @ CHI | L | 30.2 | 15 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 16 | 37.5% | 3 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | -18.0 |
| 2025-12-14 | CLE vs. CHA | L | 39.4 | 26 | 2 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 19 | 42.1% | 3 | 7 | 42.9% | 7 | 8 | 87.5% | -8.0 |
| 2025-12-12 | CLE @ WAS | W | 35.3 | 18 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 17 | 35.3% | 0 | 11 | 0.0% | 6 | 7 | 85.7% | -5.0 |
| 2025-12-06 | CLE vs. GSW | L | 32.0 | 17 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 15 | 40.0% | 1 | 6 | 16.7% | 4 | 5 | 80.0% | -14.0 |
| 2025-12-03 | CLE vs. POR | L | 29.2 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 15.4% | 1 | 8 | 12.5% | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | -8.0 |
| 2025-11-30 | CLE vs. BOS | L | 31.4 | 21 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 16 | 43.8% | 4 | 9 | 44.4% | 3 | 5 | 60.0% | -27.0 |
| 2025-11-28 | CLE @ ATL | L | 33.0 | 15 | 5 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 14 | 42.9% | 1 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 100.0% | -18.0 |
| 2025-11-23 | CLE vs. LAC | W | 29.5 | 8 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 10 | 30.0% | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 100.0% | 0.0 |
| 2025-11-21 | CLE vs. IND | W | 26.6 | 20 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 12 | 41.7% | 3 | 4 | 75.0% | 7 | 7 | 100.0% | 18.0 |
| 2025-11-10 | CLE @ MIA | L | 18.9 | 11 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 22.2% | 1 | 3 | 33.3% | 6 | 6 | 100.0% | -5.0 |
| 2025-11-07 | CLE @ WAS | W | 28.3 | 20 | 2 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 16 | 43.8% | 4 | 9 | 44.4% | 2 | 2 | 100.0% | 24.0 |
| 2025-11-05 | CLE vs. PHI | W | 26.1 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 11 | 27.3% | 2 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | 5.0 |